A company that carried an employment practices liability insurance policy for SHRM filed a lawsuit against the HR organization Tuesday, asking a court to declare that the insurer is not responsible for a multimillion-dollar punitive damage award in a race bias case.
Twin City, a subsidiary of Hartford Fire Insurance Co., said it should not be required to indemnify SHRM for the $10 million award because the jury found the HR organization engaged in intentional race discrimination and retaliation.
In Virginia, where SHRM is headquartered, state law prohibits the insuring of punitive damages awarded for intentional acts, the insurance company argued. It said it made that clear to SHRM when it first agreed to defend the organization against the race bias claim, Mohamed v. SHRM, and afterward.
The underlying claim
In Mohamed, a former employee alleged she was excluded from meetings and professional opportunities after complaining about race bias in the workplace, and fired shortly thereafter.
A jury late last year awarded her $1.5 million in compensatory damages and $10 million in punitive damages, finding that the organization discriminated against her based on her race.
SHRM requested a new trial earlier this year, arguing that a judge should have excluded evidence and arguments portraying SHRM as a “model employer,” among other things. A judge, however, upheld the verdict in April, and SHRM began the appeals process.
Next steps
The organization has until Friday to file its brief with the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, according to court documents. SHRM did not respond to a request for comment by press time.
The future of that appeal, according to the insurer, could be affected by the outcome of Tuesday’s EPLI lawsuit, Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Society for Human Resource Management.
“The parties have been unable to reach agreement regarding responsibility for funding the punitive damages award, should it be affirmed on appeal,” the insurer said in its complaint. “The coverage dispute therefore affects the parties’ present conduct and requires immediate resolution.”
